Cases 101 - 110 of 17,820
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Sanders v. USA
as 1:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Deon Sanders
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Calhoun v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher Foster
Defendant:
Ohio and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Henry
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Christopher Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Crawford P. Bogle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hodkinson v. Mackey
as 5:2024cv00614
Petitioner:
Michael A. Hodkinson
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01564
Petitioner:
Edward L Young
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
