Cases 101 - 110 of 39,634
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Josh Joyner, Debra Found and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mountain Progressive Ins.
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mountain Progressive Ins.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEPHON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cammon v. Haddix et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Cammon
Defendant:
Rachel Haddix and Correct Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
