Cases 111 - 120 of 128
Chavez v. McDonald et al
as 2:2010cv01227
Plaintiff:
Eric Chavez
Defendant:
M. D. McDonald, D. Davey, Fuestado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mello v. Aguiar et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Mello
Defendant:
Fred Aguiar, M. Macdonald, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Statti et al
as 2:2010cv00929
Plaintiff:
Ronald Foster
Defendant:
P. Statti, D. Peddicord, A. Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowell v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Calif Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Johnson
Defendant:
Calif Dept of Corrections, M. D. McDonald, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vaught v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv03422
Plaintiff:
Elbert Vaught
Defendant:
D. Clark, B. Gower, M. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Alexander v. CDC, et al
as 09-17538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, T. FELKER and others
Porter v. Cate et al
as 2:2009cv02957
Plaintiff:
Marlo Porter
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, T. Felker, M. Macdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. McDonald et al
as 2:2009cv02956
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Gomez
Defendant:
Mike McDonald, D. Davey and - Vanleer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivas v. Davey et al
as 2:2009cv02498
Plaintiff:
Pedro Joaquin Olivas
Defendant:
D. Davey, E. Sandoval and M. Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
