Cases 111 - 120 of 820
VILLASENOR v. FULLER
as 5:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
ISIDRO BUCIO VILLASENOR
Defendant:
OFFICER CO II FULLER, SINGLETON and DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv03534
Plaintiff:
David L. Rogers, Jonathan B. Lester, Lorenzo L. Shipley and others
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Brice Smith, Selena Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Baines et al
as 1:2021cv03172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Major Baines, Sgt. Ellison, Ctl. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv03138
Plaintiff:
David Lee Rogers, Jeffrey Brown, Jonathan Britt Lester and others
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Newton County Sheriff's Office, HomeWav and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARL ASHLEY THOMPSON
Defendant:
COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL, Sheriff ROD HOWELL, Capt JULIUS COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Paulding County Sheriff et al
as 4:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Paulding County Sheriff, Captain Thomas, Sgt Ellington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv02799
Plaintiff:
Zekemian Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Andy Pascuals, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. Toliver et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Brunswick Newspaper, Bill Gates, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sean Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CHENY et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, DO PALMER, DO RUSS and others
Plaintiff:
PRENTICE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banda v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Alick Ricky Banda
Defendant:
Randy Davis, D. Horton, Chief of Security H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
