Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 124
Edwin Ivan Guzman-Garcia v. John T. Rathman
as 2:2010cv03556
Petitioner: Edwin Ivan Guzman-Garcia
Respondent: John T. Rathman
Andrew v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv21159
Plaintiff: Gregory Andrew
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, John T. Rathman, Darrell Acre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00092
Plaintiff: JEREMY PINSON
Defendant: HARLEY G. LAPPIN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, RAYMOND E. HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Rathman
as 0:2009cv61813
Plaintiff: George Frank Myles, Jr.
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gholikhan v. Federal Detention Center of Miami et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv22762
Plaintiff: Shahrzad Mir Gholikhan
Defendant: Federal Detention Center of Miami, John T. Rathman, Management Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Defontes v. Rathman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv22680
Plaintiff: Nicole Michelle Defontes
Defendant: John T. Rathman, Carlos Rodriguez and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barnett v. Rathman
as 1:2009cv21204
Plaintiff: Stenneth Barnett
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cejo v. Corcoran et al
as 2:2009cv00901
Plaintiff: Merlyn Cejo
Defendant: Eugene J. Corcoran and John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Montero v. Rathman
as 1:2008cv23030
Plaintiff: Tony Montero
Defendant: John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Molten v. Rathman et al
as 1:2008cv22579
Petitioner: Michael Molten
Respondent: John T. Rathman, Federal Detention Center - Miami, Robert MacCarone and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?