Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 748
CAIN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv07310
Plaintiff: MARCELLUS CAIN
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2014cv07194
Plaintiff: GREGORY CANTY
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. NUTTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv07113
Plaintiff: JASON PARKER
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JARMON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv07021
Plaintiff: RALPH JARMON
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUTTINO v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv06990
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN CUTTINO
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv06991
Plaintiff: DEWAYNE KENNEDY
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCANDLESS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv06342
Plaintiff: RAYMOND MCCANDLESS
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, NANCY T. MCFARLAND and JULIO M. ALGARIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL
as 2:2014cv06340
Defendant: MICHELE FARRELL, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06250
Plaintiff: JOEL MAURICE POLK
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv06200
Plaintiff: MATTHEW COHEN
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?