Cases 111 - 120 of 187
Rahman v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv06095
Plaintiff:
Esteban Herrera, Sean Smith, Malik Rahman and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Dora Schriro, Warden Luis Rivera, Deputy Warden Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. USA
as 6:2013cv06441
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robinson Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thelismond v. Sanchez
as 1:2013cv05640
Plaintiff:
Belende Thelismond
Defendant:
Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Capra
as 1:2013cv04397
Plaintiff:
Eudy Sanchez
Defendant:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCray et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Cerious McCray and Kimberly Casanova
Defendant:
New York State, State Commission of Correction (SCOC), Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Stevens et al
as 1:2013cv03645
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanchez
Defendant:
R. Stevens, J. Daniels, M. O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howze v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv03237
Plaintiff:
Richard Howze
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, John Doe, John Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keesh et al v. Capra et al
as 1:2013cv02040
Plaintiff:
Tyheem Y. Keesh, Roger Silvestre, Julian L. Christopher and others
Defendant:
Michael Capra, Lesley Malin, Mu'Min Hasib and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crook v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2013cv00328
Defendant:
Armor Health Systems, P.O. Cotov, EDNY Counseling Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Graham et al
as 9:2012cv01646
Plaintiff:
Edward Sanchez
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Grafton G. Robinson, Pang Kooi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
