Cases 111 - 120 of 1,377
Werder v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Derek Todd Werder
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Milburn et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Brion Brown
Defendant:
James Milburn and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haapaniemi v. State of AK Office of Children's Services et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
State of AK Office of Children's Services, State of AK Dept. of Corrections, Jonas Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Daris E. Larson
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Terrence Haas, Nethaniel Hainje and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansberry v. Enter White House Admins
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter White House Admins
Richman v. Native Village of Selawik et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Petitioner:
Nikki Lynn Richman
Respondent:
Native Village of Selawik, Ralph Stocker and Arlene Ballot
Schneider v. Winkelman et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Lucas Canton Schneider
Defendant:
Jen Winkelman, Ian Peterschore, Nathan Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Kwon, et al.
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Daris Eric Larson, Sr.
Defendant:
Ryan Kwon, Demetrius Kargas and Yukon-Kuskokwim "Medical Department"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Turner v. Acting Commissioner Doug O'Donnell et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Keith Turner
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Doug O'Donnell and Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Official's Bethel Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Official's Bethel Jail, DOC, Andrew Carl and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
