Cases 131 - 140 of 9,750
Nunez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Nunez
Defendant:
United States of America and J Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Escobedo v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ricky Escobedo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jabeen et al v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Mena Jabeen and Asem Farooq
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morales v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
David Morales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
South v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. South
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Yanas v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joshua Zane Yanas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodela v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Elein Rodela, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Villegas v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Victor Gerardo Villegas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Graves v. S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Ryan Graves
Respondent:
Unites States of America and S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
