Cases 141 - 150 of 203
Stoker v. Hayes et al
as 1:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
Marlos Stoker
Defendant:
FNU Hayes, FNU Thomas, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Hayes et al
as 1:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Hayes, FNU Thomas, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Roe et al
as 6:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Roe, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covarrubias v. Wallace et al
as 6:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jaime Covarrubias
Defendant:
Victoria Wallace, John Wilson, Gabriel Obrigbo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 4:2011cv04473
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Totally Fit Residential Treatment Center, Samantha L Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Albert James Hadnot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmett v. Sgt Young et al
as 6:2011cv00547
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
Sgt Young, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Oklahoma Dept of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Dave Wilson
Defendant:
Oklahoma Dept of Corrections, Ron Champion, Kevin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Matt et al
as 1:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
David Lee Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Matt, FNU Flores, FNU Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deleon v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 1:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
Fernando Deleon
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Richard R Alford, Gene Krull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Lisenby et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Collier
Defendant:
Scott G Lisenby, Clint Woods, D Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
