Cases 141 - 150 of 32,354
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumford v. Stancel et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Justin Mumford
Defendant:
Sgt. Stancel, Sgt. Copeland and Sgt. Israel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biro v. Loudoun County JDR Court et al
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Defendant:
Loudoun County JDR Court, Commonwealth of Virginia, Loudoun County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Merlin Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demond Williams
Defendant:
Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Javaun Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Coffeewood Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Stewart
Defendant:
Coffeewood Correctional Center and Officer Buach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
