Cases 151 - 160 of 50,106
Barkley et al v. Ottisville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv03647
Plaintiff:
Jouheedah A. Barkley and Peter Barkley
Defendant:
Ottisville Correctional Facility and Correctional Officers Superintendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv03652
Plaintiff:
Jamar Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Florence High
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grof v. Dinello et al
as 9:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Robert Grof
Defendant:
David Dinello, Marina Medved, Gerald Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janczuk v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03754
Plaintiff:
Weronika Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean-Louis v. Board of Education
as 1:2024cv03755
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Jean-Louis
Respondent:
Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02280
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trimm v. Greenhaven Corr. Facility
as 1:2024cv02282
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Trimm
Defendant:
Greenhaven Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Awuley v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner:
Prince Awuley
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls and Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jordan v. Hussien
as 1:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jordan and Jerome Watkins
Defendant:
Abdulla Hussien and King Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Philogene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
