Cases 171 - 180 of 10,843
Tolliver v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Timothy Fitzgerald Tolliver
Respondent:
Cameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Michael S. Hanson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Isham v. Stephens County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Pete Isham
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuffin v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Chase Brooks McGuffin
Defendant:
McIntosh County and John Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Peek et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mark Richardson
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Timothy Vann and Cheyenne Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanchett v. Sheriff of Cleveland County et al
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hanchett
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cleveland County, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Diana Myles-Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00089
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrence Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Andino v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brianna Andino
Defendant:
William Hobbs and Kevin Buttler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Frank M Reynolds
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
