Cases 171 - 180 of 10,155
Osborne v. Steward et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
William Frank Osborne
Defendant:
Steward, Reyes, Mr. Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledford v. Tillamook County
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Dylan Joseph Ledford
Defendant:
Tillamook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar-Valdovinos v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Diego Aguilar-Valdovinos
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Craigen v. Gushwa et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George W. Craigen
Defendant:
Dean Gushwa, Elizabeth Baker, O.P.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeRemer v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Ross DeRemer
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogosian v. Washington County
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
James Leroy Bogosian
Respondent:
Washington County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bloodworth v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Laquintee Bloodworth
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cadabas-Barragan v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Kevin Cadabas-Barragan
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anguiano v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Anguiano, Jr.
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Arthur Bailey
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
