Cases 181 - 190 of 39,634
Franklin v. Superior Courts of Glynn County et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
Superior Courts of Glynn County and William Bill Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
William Bill Johnson, Rebecca J. Walden and District Attorney's of Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stocks v. City of Rome et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keith Obryann Stocks, Keith Obryann Stocks Trust, Keith Obryann Stocks Estate and others
Defendant:
City of Rome, Floyd County Sheriff's Department, 2 Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Ronald Brawner
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hill
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
