Cases 181 - 190 of 4,456
Beeson v. USA
as 9:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Taylor Anthony Beeson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Peterson v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Timothy Edward Peterson
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Engen et al
as 9:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Rex Allen
Defendant:
John Engen, Dave Strohmaier, Scott Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schrier v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Todd Schrier
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Bludworth, Shelly Steyh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hood et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Terence Jackson
Defendant:
J. Hood, R.D. Harper and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusk v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Zachary Rusk
Respondent:
State of Montana and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norez v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Luis Norez
Defendant:
Yellowstone County Detention Facility, Turnkey Medical Facilities and Officer Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wilson
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Davis
Defendant:
Dion Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Federal Defenders of Montana et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Davis
Defendant:
Federal Defenders of Montana and Russell Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevels v. USA
as 1:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
James N. Nevels, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
