Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Char v. Kaiser Hospital et al
as 1:2018cv00345
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-2, ACO John Doe, Doctors John Does 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Char v. KHON et al
as 1:2018cv00304
Defendant:
KHNL, John and Jane Does 1-50, KHON and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Char v. The Queen's Medical Center - West Oahu et al
as 1:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, M.D. Brandi Gary and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Ige et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
William Jackson Gay Barnes
Respondent:
Ige, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequiera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Almond v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sharon Almond
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Ted Sakai , State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Torres et al
as 1:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Thad Thompson
Defendant:
Katherine Torres, Paleka, Residency Dept. Supervisor (John Doe) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardines v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kurt Russell Cardines
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v Espinda et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaonohi Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Tuitama et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Defendant:
Tuitama, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
