Cases 11 - 20 of 3,764
Parham v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Marion Parham
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Peterburs et al
as 1:2024cv04508
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyce
Defendant:
Jason Peterburs, Kimberly Fox, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv04520
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Larry Snelling, Sgt. John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermack Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04526
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermack Health Services, Cook County Health and Hospital System and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv04514
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County, Lt. Wiggins, Deputy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Franco
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
