Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Robinson v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lewis Robinson and Little Six
Defendant:
Captain Mary Groom, Unit Manager Brown, Correctional Officer Harrington and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bringas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Mark Ien, Ms. Unknown Johnson, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Octavio Bringas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bringas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Mark Ien, Ms. Unknown Johnson, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Octavio Bringas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stilley v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
J. F. Caraway, Hugh Hurwitz, Warden M. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Stilley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Morales v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv00143
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez Morales
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark Ien, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Sistrunk
as 3:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Roger Hugh Green
Defendant:
Brady Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Stevens et al
as 2:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Randy Hughes
Defendant:
Gloria Stevens, Randy Johnson, Sheriff Dept. Jasper County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes, III v. Nance et al
as 3:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
Yerby L. Hughes, III
Defendant:
James Nance, Barbara Bailey, Chris Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Shults
as 3:2016cv00265
Petitioner:
Kerrick Deshaun Hughes
Respondent:
L. Shults
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hughes v. USA
as 3:2016cv00508
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Earl Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
