Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Monsanto-Lopez v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01855
Petitioner:
Daniel Monsanto-Lopez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monsanto-Lopez v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01181
Petitioner:
Daniel Monsanto-Lopez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOPEZ-TORRALBA v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-FOREST et al
as 2:2022cv02728
Petitioner:
ERIK LOPEZ-TORRALBA
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-FOREST, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratt v. Lopez et al
as 1:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
Leonttayy A. Pratt
Defendant:
Juan Lopez, Pedro Cruz, Lebanon Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Julio Lopez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Hertor David Lopez Martinez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lopez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Wilver R. Lopez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LOPEZ v. BEARD
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES-LOPEZ v. LOWE
as 1:2021cv01938
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Flores-Lopez
Respondent:
Craig A. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Payne v. Wyatt et al
as 3:2021cv01896
Plaintiff:
Omar Payne
Defendant:
C.O. Wyatt, Lt. Lopez and Lt. Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
