Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Howell v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Jimmy Patrick, Dothey Goode and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. USA
as 1:2014cv00262
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edwin Pierce Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Grimmett v. Regan et al
as 4:2013cv01845
Plaintiff:
Keno Grimmett
Defendant:
Regan, Leak, Clifton and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Harriss et al
as 4:2013cv01829
Plaintiff:
Alvin Randy Pierce
Defendant:
Sheriff Jimmy Harriss, Chief Jailer Matt Martin, Deputy Chief Jailer Tiffany Graham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romey v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv03576
Plaintiff:
Abraham Romey
Defendant:
Williams, Pierce and Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hamilton Aged & Informed Correction Facility et al
as 6:2012cv02382
Plaintiff:
Harold Teen Scott
Defendant:
Hamilton Aged & Informed Correction Facility, Scott, Marbutt and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Carson et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Daundera Dwight Pierce
Defendant:
Arethia Carson, Willie Myles, John Mason and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chasteen v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv04210
Petitioner:
Leldon Pierce Chasteen
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pryor v. King
as 4:2011cv03867
Petitioner:
Edwin Pierce Pryor
Respondent:
Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Doctors' Care Physician, P.C. et al
as 4:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
Alvin Randy Pierce
Defendant:
Doctors' Care Physician, P.C., M. Blevins, Todd Entrikin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
