Cases 11 - 20 of 205
(PC) Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 1:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Powell v. Lynch
as 2:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Adam Randolph Powell
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Pierce and Lively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Pierce Henderson v. Alex Villanueva
as 2:2022cv06013
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Pierce Henderson
Respondent:
Alex Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hernandez v. Macomber et al
as 2:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Hernandez
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, L. Holloway, J - Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brashear v. Pierce et al
as 2:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Brashear and Demetrius K. Brashear
Defendant:
C. Pierce, D. Heinkel, C. Norse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Pierce v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Scott Matthew Pierce
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Murphy v. Pierce et al
as 2:2021cv01789
Plaintiff:
Monrell D. Murphy
Defendant:
C. Pierce, J. Lopez and J. Lebeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Pierce et al
as 1:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Monrell D. Murphy
Defendant:
C. Pierce, J. Lopez and J. Lebeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sexton v. Aube et al
as 2:2021cv01593
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sexton
Defendant:
K. Aube, C. Pierce, W. Samplet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
