Cases 11 - 20 of 241
Gill, Charles v. Miller, Scott
as 3:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Gill, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Fuchs et al
as 2:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
Robert H Jordan
Defendant:
Larry Fuchs, R Boyer, Officer Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wixson v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Omar Wixson
Defendant:
Lt M Moore, M Miller, A Kroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Keys
as 3:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
Shariff Miller
Respondent:
R D Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Keys
as 1:2023cv00961
Petitioner:
Shariff Miller
Respondent:
R D Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pemberton, James v. Walker, Kyle et al
as 3:2023cv00476
Petitioner:
James B. Pemberton, II.
Respondent:
Kyle Walker, ADA Jessica Miller and DA Kenneth Hamm
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarado v. Benston et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Alderman, Sgt Joseph Beahm, Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Wisconsin Department Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jamal D Gentry
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Corrections and Melody Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Monfils et al
as 1:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Marcellous L Walker, Armin Wand, III, Jeremy L Wand and others
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Dane Esser, Wendy Monfils and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
John Birdyshaw, Bretzel, Dingman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
