Cases 11 - 20 of 4,078
Burnell v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Joe Baby Burnell
Defendant:
W. Montgomery, Ali Hasan, B. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shavers v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv03272
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Shavers, Jr
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McDonald v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. McDonald
Defendant:
Gena Jones, B. Chaves, Berumen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergman v. Corfman et al
as 3:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
Sean M Bergman
Defendant:
L. Corfman, Kristen Mitchell, C. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casity v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Richard Casity and Richard D. Casity
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison and B. Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Parada v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv02718
Petitioner:
Norman Parada
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodgers et al v. Keefe Commissary Network Sales
as 3:2024cv01998
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Rodgers, Michael Dean Rodgers and Albert L. Martinez
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco J. Martinez Becerra v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv04273
Petitioner:
Francisco J. Martinez Becerra
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Bonilla v. Shubb
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
William B. Shubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
