Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Awe, Kenneth v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections Region 8 Office et al
as 3:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Valentine Awe
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections Region 8 Office , C.R. Day, Field Supervisor of Unit 816 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashada, Prince v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Prince F. Rashada
Defendant:
Jon E. Litscher , Department of Corrections, Randall R. Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Day v. Wisconsin Dept of Corrections
as 2:2016cv01251
Plaintiff:
Adam O'Day
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv01435
Plaintiff:
Robert L Tatum
Defendant:
Edward Wall , Gary Boughton, Mark Kartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagar, Humberto v. Tegels, Lizzie et al
as 3:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Humberto Lagar
Defendant:
Lizzie A. Tegels , Myron Olson , S. Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Pollard
as 2:2013cv00106
Defendant:
William Pollard
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum, Robert et al v. Meisner, Mike et al
as 3:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Tatum
Defendant:
Mike Meisner , Jim Schwochert, Cathy Jess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, Wilson v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2012cv00598
Plaintiff:
Wilson Jackson
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Charles Coles, Welcome Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hughes et al
as 2:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Hughes, Michael Bertling and McLario Helm & Bertling SC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hughes et al
as 2:2010cv00989
Plaintiff:
David A Day
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Hughes, Michael Bertling and McLario Helm Bertling SC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
