Cases 11 - 20 of 132
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DONALD v. MELGREN
as 1:2019cv02312
Defendant:
ERIC F. MELGREN
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DENT v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv01810
Defendant:
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARKIN v. ADAIR et al
as 1:2019cv01638
Defendant:
THOMAS W. ADAIR and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
BILLY F. LARKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
STRAIGHT, SAMANTHA L. ZAREK, RONALD MCDAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. MEGROTA et al
as 1:2018cv02062
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. DAVIDSON, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES MASSARONE, ANUJA MEGROTA and TARSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. MOON et al
as 1:2018cv00715
Petitioner:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent:
ROBERT MOON, DERRICK CARLESLIE, CHRISTY D. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKS v. STRANGE
as 1:2018cv00532
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Defendant:
ELIZABETH A. STRANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2017cv02058
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, WILLIAM DRIGGERS and DELORES F. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
