Cases 11 - 20 of 429
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Jester
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Jester
as 1:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Respondent:
SHAWN GILLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Ben Hill County, Georgia
as 4:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Ben Hill County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollowell v. Boulee et al
as 1:2023cv05832
Petitioner:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Jean-Paul Boulee, Judge John K. Larkins, III, Norman L. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollowell v. McBath et al
as 1:2023cv05782
Petitioner:
Jo'Von Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Elizabeth McBath, Boulee Jean-Paul, John K. Larkins, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
