Cases 11 - 20 of 350
Williams v. Perry
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Michael R. Williams
Respondent:
J. Kevin Perry
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danenberg v. Perry
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Danenberg
Defendant:
Warden James Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Perry, D W Harmon, Tina Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KELVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCloud v. Classification Staff et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Dwayne William McCloud
Defendant:
Classification Staff, Ms. Edwards, Ms. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KELVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Perry
as 4:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Dwight B. Freeman
Respondent:
James K. Perry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Perry
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Dwight B. Freeman
Respondent:
James K. Perry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Marshall Rice
Defendant:
Wellpath, Ga. Dept. of Corrections, J. Kevin Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Perry
as 4:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Johnie Oliver, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Kevin J. Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
