Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Shultz v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00415
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, C. Brockway, A. Randolph and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bannister et al
as 3:2016cv00399
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Isidro Baca, Bruce Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 2:2015cv01885
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Board of Prison Commissioners, Colin Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sooga v. Aranas et al
as 2:2014cv00816
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Robert Bannister, James Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Tuiofu Sooga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Delosh v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv00632
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Robert B. Bannister, Cathrine Masto Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Delosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Masto et al
as 2:2013cv00655
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto
Petitioner:
Randolph L Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2013cv00320
Defendant:
CCDC, Jim Dixon, Sheriff Gillespie and others
Plaintiff:
William Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Potts v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv00511
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Gregory Smith
Petitioner:
Randolph William Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. MCDANIEL et al
as 3:2008cv00650
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Randolph
Respondent:
E.K. MCDANIEL and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
