Cases 11 - 20 of 389
Smith v. Coulbourn
as 1:2023cv03390
Petitioner:
Lamont M. Smith
Respondent:
T. Coulbourn and Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Smith
as 1:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Perry
Defendant:
India Smith, RN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA 2255
as 1:2023cv02567
Petitioner:
Ryan Smith
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Booze v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Gordon Everette Booze, IV
Defendant:
Tyrell Wilson, BCBTC, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Spring Grove's Admin. et al
as 1:2023cv02279
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Defendant:
Spring Grove's Admin., Dr. Edko, Dr. Laiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv02090
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Lieutenant James Smith, Corizon Health Services Inc., Physician Assistant Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01896
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahammend v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
Khalid Austin Mahammend
Defendant:
Christopher Smith and Ms. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Basnueva v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Yera Basnueva
Defendant:
Warden Jeffrey Nines, Sgt. Mallowe, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
Tavon Pratt
Defendant:
Warden, C.O.S. Mrs Ross, Shift Commander Zerita Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
