Cases 11 - 20 of 14,377
Gladney v. Silva et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Myron A Gladney
Defendant:
Nathaniel Silva, Sgt Nelson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Toms et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Bobby McNeil
Defendant:
Shawn Toms and Michael Weiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Godiwalla
as 2:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Taylor
Defendant:
Shirley Godiwalla, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nowels v. Moore
as 2:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Dionte Nowels
Defendant:
Mary Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00753
Petitioner:
Deandre Laney Rodgers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Holmes v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00752
Petitioner:
Leonard T Holmes
Respondent:
Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Crown and Common Bar and Grill et al
as 2:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Shaun Alexander
Defendant:
Crown and Common Bar and Grill and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vega
Defendant:
Capt Daniel Cushing, Capt Michael Cole, Lt Anthony Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuello Ferreras, Herppis v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00406
Petitioner:
Herppis Cuello Ferreras
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vine, Christopher v. Dotson, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Vine
Defendant:
Michael Dotson, CO Morales, Lt. Nash and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
