Cases 11 - 20 of 172
McKinney v. Bossier Medium Security et al
as 5:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jerry T McKinney
Defendant:
Bossier Medium Security, Brad Anderson, Sgt Peas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. USA
as 3:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Anderson Curtel Duke
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carter v. Proeter et al
as 5:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Marcus Carter
Defendant:
Steve Proeter, R Farris, Medical Staff Caddo Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. USA
as 2:2022cv06159
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv06151
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Rick Farris, M Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Martinez
as 2:2022cv06124
Defendant:
F Martinez and F Martinz
Plaintiff:
Arthur Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hodges v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv06060
Plaintiff:
Chaves Hodges
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Deputy Bailey, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Whittington et al
as 5:2022cv05928
Plaintiff:
Quincy Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Julian C Whittington, Brad Anderson, Lt Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
