Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Powell v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2016cv06798
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Jennifer Armstrong and Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Armstrong
as 1:2016cv03753
Respondent:
Warden Armstrong
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Miller, et al
as 9:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
C. Miller, Ives, C. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02189
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, C. Miller, New York State Department of Mental Health Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amaker v. Schiraldi et al
as 1:2015cv04879
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant:
K. Armstrong, P. Bell, A. Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerrick v. State of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03545
Respondent:
Michelle Armstrong, Richard Brown, Esq. Francis Gibbons and others
Petitioner:
Sean Jerrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
McLaughlin v. Cetina et al
as 1:2013cv06960
Plaintiff:
Don Alan McLaughlin
Defendant:
Henry Cetina, Thomas Carrero, Shawn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Stallone
as 1:2013cv03817
Plaintiff:
Armstrong Wilkerson
Defendant:
David Stallone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. NBC Universal, Inc.
as 1:2012cv08137
Plaintiff:
Lorne Armstrong
Defendant:
NBC Universal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. NBC Universal, Inc.
as 7:2012cv08137
Plaintiff:
Lorne Armstrong
Defendant:
NBC Universal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
