Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Woods v. Carijival et al
as 1:2017cv00289
Plaintiff:
Carlos Woods
Defendant:
M D Carijival, M A Stancial, K Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Serpas et al
as 2:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
Eddie F Armstrong
Defendant:
Ronal Serpas and Lester C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Serpas et al
as 5:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Eddie F Armstrong
Defendant:
Ronal Serpas and Lester C Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Federal Tort Claims Act Staff et al
as 1:2014cv02226
Plaintiff:
Kenrick Armstrong
Defendant:
Federal Tort Claims Act Staff, Dept of Justice and Federal Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Federal Correctional Institution Pollock Medium
as 1:2013cv03183
Plaintiff:
Kenrick Armstrong
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution Pollock Medium
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Winn Correctional Center
as 3:2013cv02877
Plaintiff:
Henry E Armstrong
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium et al
as 5:2013cv00596
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Employees Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, Millicks, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium et al
as 1:2013cv00596
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Employees Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, Millicks, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2011cv01126
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriffs Calcasieu, Dept of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Trelis Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Ouachita Parish Correctional Center
as 3:2010cv01601
Plaintiff:
Henry Armstrong
Defendant:
Warden Ouachita Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
