Cases 11 - 20 of 57
SCHOBERT v. JONES
as 4:2016cv00623
Plaintiff:
JIMMY BRIAN SCHOBERT
Defendant:
S JONES and ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHOBERT v. VARONA et al
as 4:2016cv00564
Plaintiff:
JIMMY BRIAN SCHOBERT
Defendant:
A VARONA, DALLAS, S JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00360
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections , Thomas Reid , Dave Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Mae Helen Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON v. SMITH et al
as 4:2014cv00465
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THOMPSON
Defendant:
B SMITH, J SIKES, D ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullock v. Kelly et al
as 1:2014cv21222
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Bullock
Defendant:
Kelly, Nelson, Bembry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2014cv00181
Petitioner:
HELEN ATKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MELENDEZ v. BRANTLY et al
as 4:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H MELENDEZ
Defendant:
BRANTLY, SEWELL, MCCALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2013cv00638
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN A BRADLEY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, MICHAEL CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00912
Petitioner:
Joshua Atkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv01620
Petitioner:
Joshua Atkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
