Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Paige et al v. Supervisors of the Parole Officers et al
as 6:2020cv01851
Defendant:
Cecilia Sanjines, Board of Parole and Probation, Charity Snyder and others
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Paige and Lynn Marie Paige
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. McCarley et al
as 6:2020cv01169
Defendant:
James Welsh and Kevin McCarley
Plaintiff:
Brandon Deshawn Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01889
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cornett v. Reegen et al
as 2:2019cv00525
Defendant:
Detective Mike Reegen, Detective Pallayo and Baker City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Russell Cornett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Appropriate Housing Officer, Appropriate Job Assignment employee, Appropriate Personal BHS Counselor of Inmate Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Cox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. (Oregon Dept. of Corrections) O.D.O.C et al
as 2:2017cv00272
Defendant:
(Oregon Dept. of Corrections) O.D.O.C and Stuart Young
Plaintiff:
Ernest Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. USA
as 1:2016cv01119
Petitioner:
Clyde Warren Baker, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Adams v. USA
as 6:2016cv00138
Petitioner:
Shawn David Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stidhem et al v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2015cv00379
Plaintiff:
Seth Arnett, Ernest Baker, Daniel Bluestein and others
Defendant:
Toni Hamby, Trent Juif, Lorinda Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Benson et al
as 2:2014cv02058
Respondent:
Baker County Parole and Probation and Will Benson
Petitioner:
Jason Andrew Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
