Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Coleman v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Coleman
Defendant:
Andrew Mills, Rita Bonner, Darlene Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gannon v. Kemp et al
as 2:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Creighton Gannon
Defendant:
Todd Kemp, Mike McCara, Ben Ivy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Barnett
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Len Bonner Jones
Defendant:
Tenisha Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toomer v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carl Toomer
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Unknown Williams, Unknown Spotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Hinds County Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Richard Lanard Bonner
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. South Mississippi Correctional Institute et al
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
South Mississippi Correctional Institute, Lt. Bonner and Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. South Mississippi Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Hubbard
Defendant:
South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Lt. Bonner and Denmark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. South Mississippi Correctional Institute et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
South Mississippi Correctional Institute, Johnnie Denmark, Lt. Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varnado v. South Mississippi Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Carlos Levine Varnado
Defendant:
South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Brenda Sims and Rita Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
