Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Smith v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Sliwinski v. Brian Gootkin, et al
as 23-35074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EMIL SLIWINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN GOOTKIN, PAUL REES, BILTOFT, Lt. and others
Nickerson v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin and James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin and James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Reinert, Jr. v. Brian Gootkin, et al
as 22-35921
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD DOUGLAS REINERT, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN GOOTKIN and PETE BLUDWORTH, Warden
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Dale, Dave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Dale, Dave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Russell Wayne Bullock
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Brian Gootkin and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Smith v. Johnson, et al
as 22-35766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, Designated Hearings Officer, ROXANNE WIGERT, JAMES SALMONSEN and others
Jacob Smith v. Johnson, et al
as 22-35633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, Designated Hearings Officer, ROXANNE WIGERT, JAMES SALMONSEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
