Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Jones and Vizion
Defendant:
Ms. Davis, Mr. Jones, Ms. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. JOHN DOE et al
as 7:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Warden BEASLEY, Deputy Warden MARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Effingham County Jail
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Benito David Bryant
Defendant:
Effingham County Jail, Effingham Sheriff's Dept. and W. Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. White
as 1:2022cv04812
Petitioner:
Jason Bryant
Respondent:
Jermaine White and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FORD
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR STEPHANIE BRYANT, INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER ELLISON and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOVEY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCCOVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, AARON PINERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE GARY
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, OFFICER WILLIAMS, LT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYNER v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B TYNER
Defendant:
SGT PAUL THOMAS, C/O GIBSON, C/O GOLPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRANFORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
BILLY CRANFORD, III
Defendant:
ERIC BRYANT, DONALD K WILLIAMS and KYLE SELPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
