Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Loren-Maltese et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv02637
Plaintiff:
Betty Loren-Maltese
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Internal Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Betti et al
as 2:2009cv00871
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
L. Betti, D. Neimann and M. Beutler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bun v. Felker et al
as 2:2009cv00631
Plaintiff:
Chanthon Bun
Defendant:
T. Felker, Wright, R Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirell Taylor v. Henry Paulson et al
as 2:2009cv01544
Plaintiff:
Kirell Taylor
Intervenor:
Kirell Francis Bettis
Defendant:
Henry Paulson, Shellie Samuels, Michael Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Kirell Francis Bettis v. Linda Tillie-Moore et al
as 2:2009cv00788
Plaintiff:
Kirell Francis Bettis
Defendant:
Linda Tillie-Moore and Martin L. Hercovitz
Intervenor:
Kirell Francis Bettis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Hansen v. Hornbeak
as 2:2008cv02513
Petitioner:
Betty Hansen
Respondent:
Tina Hornbeak
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Felker et al
as 2:2008cv02188
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Felker, T. Perez, D. Vanderville and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Betti et al
as 2:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
L Betti, T. Felker, B Ingwerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheeks v. People
as 3:2007cv06291
Plaintiff:
Betty A. Cheeks
Defendant:
People
Respondent:
Dawn Davison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burleson v. Samson, et al
as 2:2000cv02591
Plaintiff:
Jesse Clyde Burleson
Defendant:
Felipe M Samson , Hans Madave , La Rue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
