Cases 11 - 20 of 75
HIPP v. LOFTON et al
as 5:2020cv00133
Defendant:
DEPUTY DERRICK LOFTON, DEPUTY TOMMY HARRIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND NATHANIEL HIPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDWICK et al v. CORRECTHEALTH BIBB LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00127
Defendant:
SCOTT CHAPMAN, DANIEL MATTOX, Michael Parrott and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hardwick and Scott Hardwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODARD v. BIBB COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2020cv00108
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL and SERGEANT WILKERSON
Plaintiff:
LARON WOODARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. BIBB COUNTY LEC JAIL et al
as 5:2020cv00096
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE ONEAL GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BIBB COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2020cv00026
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DOE et al
as 5:2019cv00512
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Bibb County Jail and DOE
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DAUNE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNDY v. FERRERI et al
as 5:2019cv00510
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY LEC MEDICAL, FERRERI, PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
DEVANTE L LUNDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. FLONAR et al
as 5:2019cv00157
Defendant:
OFFICER CYNTHIA FLONAR and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Plaintiff:
ROGER GIBSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. TERRY, et al
as 5:2018cv00435
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY T EDWARDS, DEPUTY ANTHONY TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ANTHONY TERRY, STEPHEN FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
