Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Myron Atrice Payne et al v. Stu Sherman
as 2:2016cv08001
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Board of Prison Hearings
Petitioner:
Myron Patrice Payne
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Paul Richardson v. Board of Prison Hearings
as 5:2016cv01733
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings
Petitioner:
Paul Richardson
Gariano v. Board of Prison Hearings
as 2:2016cv01488
Petitioner:
Matthew Edward Gariano
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gariano v. Board of Prison Hearings
as 1:2016cv01165
Petitioner:
Matthew Edward Gariano
Respondent:
Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Board of Prison Hearings
as 5:2016cv03169
Plaintiff:
Paul Richardson
Defendant:
Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Lathan v. California Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00757
Plaintiff:
(PC) Lathan and Kerry L. Lathan
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections, D. Armand, Witcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villacres v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00305
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Villacres
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Board of Prison Hearings, California Office of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. The Board of Prison Hearings
as 3:2015cv05136
Plaintiff:
Earnest Cassell Woods
Defendant:
The Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. Brown, et al.
as 2:2015cv01548
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Prison Hearings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
