Cases 11 - 20 of 129
Carlton v. Core Civic et al
as 6:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
Core Civic, Kevin Marler, Robert Adams, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKISSIC v. GEORGIA
as 4:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYNER v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B TYNER
Defendant:
SGT PAUL THOMAS, C/O GIBSON, C/O GOLPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONSON v. SIZMORE et al
as 1:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
CARLTON E MONSON
Respondent:
JUDGE W JAMES SIZMORE, JR and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEWIS LAMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dale v. Speed et al
as 1:2022cv03506
Plaintiff:
Stephen Henry Dale
Defendant:
Carlton Speed, Officer Poole, Nurse Bobbie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. Speed et al
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Stephen Henry Dale
Defendant:
Carlton Speed, Officer Poole, Nurse Bobbie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLTON v. DEWITT et al
as 5:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER DEWITT, UNIT MANAGER WILCOX and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
Carlton Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Carr and John Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHIDDON v. POWELL et al
as 7:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
JASON KYLE WHIDDON
Defendant:
Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, KEVIN DENNIS, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
