Cases 11 - 20 of 48
CHANDLER v. STRAUDER et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JAKALE E CHANDLER
Defendant:
OFFICER STRAUDER, OFFICER WOODS, OFFICER POWEL and others
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chandler v. Strauder et al
as 1:2022cv05161
Plaintiff:
Jakale E. Chandler
Defendant:
Strauder, Commander: Mr. Woods, Powel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
JAKALE ERRION CHANDLER
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Converse et al
as 1:2022cv03359
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Converse, Crutchfield, Kebo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADDY v. MERRITT et al
as 4:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD JERMAINE GRADDY
Defendant:
PEYTON MERRITT, CHANDLER BUCHANAN and DERRELL GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. East Central Regional Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Dr. Sarita Sharma, East Central Regional Hospital and Dr. Ajai Kalla
Plaintiff:
Jordan Chandler Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Jackson County Jail
as 2:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
Michael Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
