Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. R. Zamora, et al
as 12-56137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. A. ZAMORA, individual capacity, J. JAVAUX, individual capacity and M. VELA, individual capacity
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. T. Repasky, et al
as 12-16200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
T. REPASKY, Dentist, Y. OLIVAS, Appeals Coordinator, L. D. ZAMORA, Appeal Coordinator and others
Pickett v. Sacramento Superior Court et al
as 2:2011cv02321
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
Sacramento Superior Court and Kate Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Repasky et al
as 3:2011cv04367
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Repasky, Y. Olivas, L. D. Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. R. Zamora, et al
as 11-55818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. A. ZAMORA, in individual capacity, J. JAVAUX, in individual capacity and M. VELA, in individual capacity
N Charles Pickett v. R A Zamora et al
as 2:2011cv02008
Defendant:
J Javaux, M Vela and R A Zamora
Plaintiff:
N Charles Pickett, Jr
Pickett et al v. Brown
as 3:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
N. Charles Pickett, Jr., William Earl Tolbert, William Little Anderson and others
Defendant:
E. G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Pickett, Jr. v. R. A. Zamora, et al
as 10-56312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN CHARLES PICKETT, Jr., AKA N. Charles Pickett, Jr., AKA N. C. Pickett, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. A. ZAMORA, Correct Offr, M. MELA, CCII App Coord, J. JAVAUX, CCII App Coord and others
Pickett v. Grounds
as 2:2010cv02223
Petitioner:
Norman Charles Pickett, Jr.
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
N C Pickett, Jr v. R A Zamora et al
as 2:2010cv05660
Defendant:
John Doe, D Foston, J Javaux and others
Plaintiff:
N Charles Pickett, Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
