Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Winn v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
Antoine Winn
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Calvin Williams, Cleveland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulford v. Cleveland Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv01533
Plaintiff:
Dennis B. Fulford
Defendant:
Cleveland Police Department and Richard T. Mauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luna v. City of Cleveland Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv02594
Plaintiff:
Ramon Luna
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Police Department, William Mason, Deborah Naiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Gray et al
as 2:2011cv00944
Plaintiff:
Earl Banks
Defendant:
Gina Gray, E. Marie, John Vinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. McGrimmett et al
as 2:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
Rofresci Dewight Young
Defendant:
H. M. McGrimmett, Cleveland Police Department/City and Cable One /Cable Communication Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Mason et al
as 1:2011cv01185
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
William Mason and Cleveland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Anderson v. Yasir Amawi, et al
as 11-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
YASIR AMAWI, CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, EAST CLEVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Nash v. Reid et al
as 1:2010cv02926
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Nash
Defendant:
Bob Reid, City of Cleveland Police Department, Robert Triozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Rawls v. City of Euclid, et al
as 10-4099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EUCLID, CLEVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, EUCLID POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Anderson v. Amawi et al
as 1:2010cv01737
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
Yasir Amawi, City of East Cleveland, East Cleveland Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
