Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Chauncey v. Coffee County Drug Unit et al
as 5:2020cv00112
Defendant:
Coffee County Drug Unit, Officer FNU Metts, Miss FNU Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
William Matthew Chauncey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTT v. COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
SHERIFF DOYLE WOOTEN and COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
JOHN RALPH LOTT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLS v. COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Rawls
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and COFFEE COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley El v. Kemp et al
as 5:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Sgt Joyce, Lt. White, City of Douglas GA and others
Plaintiff:
Grand Shiek Amir Mobley El and Kenneth Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Perry et al
as 4:2019cv00095
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison, GDC/DOC, Ware State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Perry et al
as 5:2019cv00032
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison, GDC/DOC, Ware State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asberry v. Coffee County Correctional Facility
as 5:2019cv00027
Defendant:
Coffee County Correctional Facility, W. Cook, Warden Steve Upton and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Asberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tift County Jail et al
as 5:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ryan Harris
Defendant:
Tift County Jail and Coffee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tift County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ryan Harris
Defendant:
Tift County Jail and Coffee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00463
Petitioner:
Juan Jay Mayes
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Homer Bryson, Commissioner of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
