Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Randolph v. Gansler et al
as 1:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
Catherine Denise Randolph
Defendant:
Douglas Gansler and William Brockman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lyles v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2012cv03667
Petitioner:
Francisco Lyles
Respondent:
G. Hershberger, Douglas Gansler and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center et al
as 1:2012cv03488
Plaintiff:
Octavius Chyne Cox
Defendant:
Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, BCDC, Circuit Court for Baltimore City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pushia v. Shearin et al
as 1:2012cv02657
Petitioner:
Marion Anthony Pushia
Respondent:
Bobby Shearin, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and Douglas Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allsberry v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2011cv02671
Petitioner:
Tyrone Jack Allsberry
Respondent:
John S. Wolfe and Douglas Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diggs v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2011cv01859
Petitioner:
Gerard K. Diggs
Respondent:
John Wolfe and Douglas Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01618
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dickinson v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv01490
Petitioner:
William Bryan Dickinson
Respondent:
Kathleen Green, Douglas Gansler and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
