Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Bray v. Sinnett et al
as 6:2020cv00324
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff Dept, John Christian, Brian LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Jeromy David Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Anna Estevez, John Smithee, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gage v. United States Dept of Veterans Affairs
as 5:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
Denton W Gage
Defendant:
United States Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draper v. United States et al
as 5:2018cv01070
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA, GOVERNOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kriebel v. MO Dept. of Social Services et al
as 4:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jared Lloyd Kriebel
Defendant:
MO Dept of Social Services, Michelle Hastings and U.S. Dept of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Winfield et al
as 4:2016cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jonel Lewis
Defendant:
Detention Officer Winfield, Detention Officer Anderson and Tulsa County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2013cv00569
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Enid Police Dept. et al
as 4:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Lynn Edwards
Defendant:
Enid Police Dept., Officer Bush, Officer Fuska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Alford et al
as 5:2011cv01353
Plaintiff:
Robert Nelson Clifton
Defendant:
Thomas H Alford, Larry Moore, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
