Cases 11 - 20 of 919
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Scott Joseph Faulkner v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Faulkner
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Medical Director Thomas Minahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Turner
as 3:2024cv01875
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County (Mayor), CDCR Director, Warden Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Hill v. Tyler et al
as 4:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Patty Tyler, Director Stephanie Clendenin and Tom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael L. Overton v. Warden CMC East et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Defendant:
Warden CMC East, Bank of the West C.E.O., Kevin Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
